as appeared in audioMUSINGS
Issue No. 2 1998
by Larry CoxI am a tube fascist. I make no
excuses for that, but thought you should know
right off the bat that I expect to be using a
tube preamplifier on the day they plant me eight
feet under. That said, I was impressed with the
Alternate Audio solid state line stage.
I was dumbfounded by the bottom end of the
BCAP. While I love the body and imaging of tubes
and their life like textures, tubes just don't do
bass like solid state. Although I haven't missed
the bottom end while using tubes for the past
seven years, bass is a good thing, and I can
understand the attraction of solid state
components for passing real and deep bass
information. It was a joy to listen to the
Alternate reproduce amplified bass guitar, and to
have kick drums reproduced with a force that I
felt almost as much as heard.
However, what really told me that my systems
have had less than solid bass these past seven
years was to hear the Alternate reproduce
acoustic bass. Charlie Haden's plucking on
Missouri Sky was practically electric with
"liveness." The strings chattered when
plucked hard, and had an excellent sense of
texture and vibrato. I was not looking forward to
hearing the rest of the frequency spectrum on
this preamplifier as, in my experience, solid
state usually delivers hard, etched, and
unpleasant sound.
The Alternate was much better than I expected,
but it still lacked the light touch that may be
the exclusive domain of tubes. However, unlike a
lot of the solid state preamplifiers that I have
heard, the BCAP did not have a hardness or glare
in the midrange. The treble was quite extended,
detailed, and not the least bit hard-sounding.
Image specificity was quite good as well, with
images having a distinct left to right position.
Front to back layering was modestly specific,
although that layering was not a challenge to
what tubes can do.
The volume pot and input selectors felt very
smooth. The four inputs were plenty for my taste
and equipment. Aesthetically, the Alternate is
understated like the older Threshold designs,
with little visual embellishment on the front,
save for two handles placed at the far left and
right. The appearance of the handles is awkward
and a bit ugly-they seem to project a little too
far out from the front of the face plate.
However, when it came time to use them, they were
the perfect size for my fingers. I guess I'll
defer to form following function, if it is agreed
that having handles is a necessity. Personally, I
don't think handles on a preamplifier are
necessary.
I don't have any important objections to the
Alternate Audio BCAP. After living with it for
awhile I thought to myself, this is a pretty darn
good preamplifier, and came to appreciate the
fact that its clarity and detail was by no means
harsh or hard. I even started to think to myself
that I could live with it. But after reinserting
my own tube preamplifier, I realized that while I
had learned to live with the Alternate's sound, I
was not a contended puppy. I'm still a tube
fascist.
The liquidity, warmth, textures, and delicate
touch that tubes have just reinforced my
tube-aholicism. Palpability and front-to-back
soundstaging are more important to me than I
suspected. Despite my criticism, I think that the
Alternate Audio preamplifier is a successful
design. Its attractions were like a confirmed
bachelor meeting a woman that wants to get
married. I can appreciate the possibilities, but
it's just not for me.
If you have not been seduced by tubes, you
could probably be very happy with the Alternate
Audio preamplifier. I have been seduced by tubes,
and didn't hear what I needed to change my
preferences.
|