as appeared in audioMUSINGS
Issue No. 2 1998
by Dave ClarkSeveral thoughts came to mind
after removing my Reference Line passive
preamplifier to insert the Alternate Audio
preamplifier. The first was how similar the two
units sounded, the second was how different they
were in design, and the last was "How the
heck does Dan Patten do this for only$1500?"
Let me address this point by point. Both units
are very detailed and clean, though the Reference
Line is slightly more transparent than the BCAP.
(After all, the Reference Line is just a few
wires, some switches and jacks, two resistors,
and a stepped attenuator! not much to mess up the
sound with.) It is amazing just how
clean-sounding the BCAP is by comparison,
especially when you take into account its
numerous parts and elaborate design. Yeah,
there's some grain and veiling, but not enough to
make me say, "Hey, who pulled the
shades!" I hear slightly less air or body
than I do with the passive preamplifier, but not
enough to draw my attention away from the music.
The BCAP is also very fast and dynamic. What
else would you expect from a single-ended class A
transistor preamplifier? Compared to the
passive/EAD combo, the BCAP/EAD's presentation
was much more dynamic (micro and macro), with
starts and stops coming at startling speed. This
was very impressive on discs from Bill Laswell,
or percussive artists like Scorn and Portishead.
The BCAP/EAD combo has more three-dimensional
imaging, along with deeper bass and airier
treble. The faults of the EADDAC are mitigated to
a much greater degree with an active preamplifier
than with a passive one-the passive unit passes
on the responsibility of driving the amplifier to
your source component, affecting bass drive and
dynamics.
An active preamplifier such as the BCAP
changes the whole story. You'll still hear the
intrinsic character of the source component, but
(all other things being equal) the active stages
in a preamplifier will do a far better job
driving an amplifier. I found the BCAP's imaging
to be pretty much as deep as the Reference
Line's, and more dimensional, but still
two-dimensional. If I want three-dimensional
imaging, it's all in the tubes! While the BCAP's
images were not quite as tall or as wide as those
portrayed through thepassive unit, there's still
good separation of images, and with the BCAP they
are more between than around the speakers. This
is not to say that the BCAP doesn't offer a
satisfactory soundstage, just that it is not
necessarily better than the passive's, which I
find to be quite credible, though not all that I
want it to be.
My system falls to the dark and warm side of
neutrality, mostly because of the EAD 1000. I
like this fatter presentation, and tend to turn
away from the lean and analytical. The passive
lets the warmth through, adding little if
anything to the tonal picture. Is the BCAP as
neutral? Well, the BCAP/EAD combo produced pretty
much the same warm, dark tonality, with a few
minor deviations. The BCAP produced a frequency
emphasis in the bass region, providing more whomp
or bass slam than the passive, but not
necessarily more detail. The bass was never boomy
or exaggerated, but was simply more prominent.
Treble was still on the soft side, though
reasonably detailed, just like that of the
passive. No glare or hardness added to offend the
listener, regardless of volume level.
It was the bass reproduction that really
caught my attention. On most music the bass
emphasis was quite enjoyable, though on some cuts
there was a tendency to lose the rhythm a bit.
Especially out of sync was the Shelleyan Orphan
disc Carol uses to evaluate components. The kick
drum on track one is very low and powerful, but
through the BCAP it lagged behind the rest of the
group. Yeah, there were gobs of oomph and
explosive depth, but come on and catch up with
the rest of us here! With the passive
preamplifier in the system, the bass on this
track is right in sync, but not quite as
visceral. Mind you, while I never find my system
to be lacking in bass extension, it could offer
more slam.
The BCAP alleviates this to a degree, though
still within the limitations inherent to the
speaker. I found myself selecting discs that
would benefit from the BCAP's bass drive, leading
me to listen to old but not-forgotten favorites.
One disc that really benefitted was Christian
McBride's "gettin' to it," which caused
Robert, my bass-playing neighbor, to remark that
the BCAP's bass portrayal is much more
"there" than the passive's, with the
timbre being spot on. Perhaps not quite as
transparent as with the passive, but oh so
tonally correct for a stand-up bass, with plenty
of woody resonance and oomph to really make the
track come alive.
Of course, with the good comes the bad.
Certain vocal tracks took on a hollow or honky,
less "real" quality. I never found this
very objectionable, since most of the music I
listen to is instrumental. No doubt this quality
is of a very narrow-band nature, and thus does
not appear on all tracks, much less all systems.
Female vocals were less affected than male
vocals, leading to the conclusion that this shift
in tonality is also responsible for the bass
emphasis and the lack of the rhythmic drive on
several discs.
Fit and finish are first rate, with a machined
aluminum chassis of considerable heft. Ergonomics
of the BCAP are very acceptable, with back lit
control knobs, well-spaced Tiffany RCA jacks, and
enough inputs to accommodate the most elaborate
of systems. Alas, no phono section, but that
seems to be the sign of the times in
preamplifiers. A remote control version is in the
works that ups the performance slightly and the
price not so slightly. In several ways the
Alternate Audio BCAP was superior to what I had
become accustomed to with the Reference Line.
If my passive is Clark Kent, the BCAP is
Superman-a great, sensitive guy but with an alter
ego that is all muscle and brawn. Watch out bad
guys! Faster than a speeding passive, more
powerful than a source alone?!
|